The
amount of water entering the engine is adjusted with the needle valve
by watching the rate at which bubbles enter the jar. I set it initially
at one
bubble per second at idle. The other end is a lawn irrigation 90°
fitting inserted into a hole in the PCV hose going to the manifold.
This is how it draws a vacuum to suck water from the jar.
The first surprise was all the black crap
it blew out the exhaust. I had thought it was pretty clean after
running hydrogen. This (and white smoke) stopped in a few minutes.
I
drove to the store 5 miles away, stopped and opened the hood. NO
bubbles. So far I have had to open the valve twice. I suspect the
plastic needle changes with temperature. It this persists, it will be
replaced with a brass valve with stainless needle.
According to the National Weather Service, the relative humidity is 3%
!The car runs
smoothly and has enough power the spin the rear wheels. At 45 miles an
hour the vacuum gage reads 15-16 inches. It may take a while for me to
get all these things optimized, but so far I am very pleased.
A
word of caution if you would like to try this yourself... The jar must
be well sealed in order to use the number of bubbles as an indicator of how
much water is being injected.
April 18, 08I
am making a new jar that is glass with a metal lid and replacing the
plastic needle valve with a brass one. Not much to it really. The new
one will connect to the venturi vacuum port on the carburetor instead
of the PCV port. Why? While the PCV connection seemed to work just
fine, I feel the vacuum port will allow for better mixing.
April 19, 08The
brass needle valve was a big improvement over the plastic aquarium
model. Upon starting the engine there was no black soot ejected from
the tail pipe as there was the first time. Maybe that means it got
cleaned out.
I checked the bubble rate after 5 miles. No
change. Checked again after another 5 miles. No flow. This won't
do. For the 18 mile trip the water level dropped about 3/4".
Oh,
yes... the new jar is glass that 24 ounces of yucky cheese dip came in.
It has a metal lid and sort of a rubber seal. I attached two 90°
barbed irrigation fittings with J-B Weld from both sides.
Back
at the shop I tried an irrigation drip system flow metering emitter on
a hunch. It is rated at 1 gallon per hour. Somewhere around here I have
some that are 1/2 gallon per hour. Even that sounds like a lot, but in
the jar the bubbles are coming at about twice what I am going for with
the 1 gallon emitter, so the 1/2 gallon one should be about what I want.
This is what
Irrigation Tutorials says about this type:
"Diaphragm" emitters all use some type of flexible diaphragm to reduce the flow and pressure.
There are many ways used to do this. The bottom line is they all use some type of flexible part that moves to restrict
the water flow. As with anything that moves, they will wear out eventually (which may be a very long time!) which
is the downside. The advantage is that they tend to be much more accurate in controlling the flow and pressure
than the previous types.
If you intend to try this device, be aware that the pointed barb should go toward the supply jar.This
looks like a much better idea than an orifice or a needle valve.
Next will be to try various injection mixtures that other people have
used successfully.
http://www.waterinjection.info/ Windshield washer fluid seems popular.
It
is funny that I started the HHO generator and the water vapor injector
projects with first class hardware, then ended up replacing most of it
with lawn irrigation parts that were MUCH cheaper and easier to work
with.
I
bought a bag of 25 emitters rated at 1/2 GPH. I thought maybe I should
start the engine then plug them in. Then thought "Naw, it will be ok.".
Every one of them is defective (made by Raindrip). No diaphragms. The
engine sucked in about a pint of water before I could shut it off. Does
not seem to have done any damage, but very scary nonetheless. I used a
1 GPH emitter that seems slower than the rest. Time for some serious
mileage checking.
I
have found these offered in flow rates of 2, 1, and 1/2 GPH,
plus 4, and 2 (.6GPH) Liters/minute. I dissected one of
these and found the diaphragm is much thicker than I expected and has
sort of a zig-zag maze on both sides of the disc. Clever design.

I
added denatured alcohol to make a 40% mixture. When I started the
engine I found a fresh batch of carbon soot on the concrete behind the
car. Guess the alcohol helps clean it even more than just plain water.
April 22, 08A
new set of jets were made by soldering the holes then re-drilling
to a diameter calculated to have 20% less area than the original jets.
This is
NOT recommended by
Holley, because you are not real sure what the exact flow is. For
instance, a #65 jet has a flow rate of 65 CC/min. I am fairly confident
though, since I have been doing this since the 1960's.
Do it at your own risk! When I think I have the size I want I can order a broached set that has been flowed.
The
plan is to check my theory that a much leaner mixture will not seem
lean to the engine because the hydrogen enables more effective burning
of the gasoline. The water and/or water/alcohol injection should help
prevent preignition.
Road
testing. The car ran very smoothly with lots of power. I am wondering
if that means I can lean it out a little more, but I want an idea of
the mileage before I can think about that.
After
10 miles, the level in the jar dropped by 8 ounces. Most of that was at
45 miles and hour, but there were several traffic lights and stop signs.
April 28, 08
The
jets are even smaller now, #55 drill size or .055" diameter,
which is 31% smaller area than the original jets. There is a little
reduction in mid throttle power, but open throttle remains unchanged as
far as I can see. This is because the power valve opens at 5 inches of
mercury. One size smaller than that was tried first with major
reduction in performance.
I can see little difference with the
the hydrogen on, or off. That is a disappointment. Other people claim
great gains with hydrogen, but it varies greatly from car to car.